Transgender Athlete Terry Miller

Transgenders Vs Women, Who is More Woke?

In the February 7, 2019 photo above, two sixteen-year-old Transgender athletes, Terry Miller, second from left and Andraya Yearwood, left, placed first and second respectively in the Connecticut girls Class S indoor track meet at Hillhouse High school in New Haven, Connecticut. Miller and Yearwood have won 15 different state championship titles that were once held by nine other girls across the state. Here are just a few of many instances of biological males competing against biological females in sports:

  • JayCee Cooper, a trans powerlifter, set records in women’s bench press after only having powerlifted for a year.
  • In 2018, trans cyclist, Rachel McKinnon, took first among the women at the UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championship.
  • In 2017, transgender weightlifter, Laurel Hubbard, set master’s world records and won the Commonwealth Games in Australia.
  • In 2014, transgender pro-MMA fighter Fallon Fox beat Tamikka Brents, giving her a concussion and broken orbital bone.

Recently, I attended an event not meant to be political, but when you’re in the Washington D.C. area, it takes no longer than 15 minutes in any gathering for the topic to abruptly turn south down the avenue of conversations best not had.  This was one such gathering, and the topic we landed on was transgender females competing against biological females in high school and college sports.

There is no shortage of stories about transgender females rising to the top of their respective sport or people on both sides of the issue with strong opinions.  One such story was central to the conversation I found myself enmeshed in involved two students at Cromwell high school in Connecticut, who were born male but now identify as female. The two students, Terry Miller and Andraya Yearwood (see featured photo above), placed first and second, respectively, in the 100-meter dash during the state finals. Additionally, Terry and Andraya hold 15 different state championship titles that were once held by nine different girls across the state.

As you can imagine, there were mixed opinions on the fairness of transgender females competing against biological females, not only relevant to this example but across the spectrum of all sports.  Some weighed in on the side of inclusivity. Others thought inclusivity was secondary to biological females unfairly losing to transgender females still possessing male physicality aspects. Both points of view seem reasonable to those that hold them, but what do the biological females who regularly lose to transgender females think?

Selina Soule, a biological female from Glastonbury high school, competed against Terry and Ayrla in the state preliminary 55-meter race. To advance to the finals, runners in this race could place no lower than 7th place. Selina Soule placed 8th, losing out to Terry and Andraya, who placed 1st and 2nd respectively.  Selina and two other girls have filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights.

They allege they’ve been denied their Title IX rights enacted by congress in 1972 to ensure that women receive the same opportunities in education and interscholastic sports that men do. The Obama administration decreed a national directive to public schools in 2016 to interpret the word “sex” in Title IX to include “gender identity.”  The Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) position agrees with the Obama administration saying, “transgender girls are girls,” and as such, they can compete against biological females.

A dejected Selina commented, “Just like my fellow competitors, I race to win,” she said. “But that’s virtually impossible now in an unlevel playing field. No matter how hard I try, I’ll never be able to be competitive with someone who’s biologically a male … No amount of practice and determination will ever get other girls or me to a place where we will have a fair chance to win. But the CIAC doesn’t seem to care”.

Whether it’s New Zealand weightlifter Laurel Hubbard or Rachel McKinnon winning gold in a U.K. cycling contest, or numerous other accounts of transgender people exhibiting obvious advantages, one thing seems to be ironically true and trendy – political correctness in the name of inclusiveness is codifying a bizarre form of unwitting misogyny against biological females. The pro-transgender side pretends that creating a level playing field is as simple as requiring transgender women to undergo hormone therapy to block testosterone. There is a growing number of folks in this group who want to eliminate this requirement. Hormone therapy does reduce physical ability in transgender females, but is it enough?  How could it be?

At the time of this posting, 24 states have no medical hormones or surgery required, 18 states have no set requirements and a muddled message, and only eight states require either reassignment surgery, hormone therapy, or that student competes in sports based on their birth certificate. The bottom line is high schools don’t monitor the testosterone levels of trans-athletes.  Even at the university level, there is no monitoring. Instead, the NCCA requires that hormone therapy be administered 12 months before males identify as females can compete against biological females. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) allows transgender females to compete with testosterone levels three times higher than biological women. Is that fair?

How can any of it be fair when testosterone management does not eliminate the male advantage of size, height, greater bone density, more lung capacity, larger circulating blood volume, larger heart to pump more oxygen to muscles, longer reach, more muscle fibers, and a skeletal design that allows males to pivot with superior speed?

Sadly, it appears there is little advocacy for biological females, even from the National Organization for Women, the Feminist Majority Foundation, and most other women’s groups. They’ve decided by their actions that it’s ok for biological women to have opportunity stolen from them by biological males, whether it’s at the high school level, the college campus, or the Olympics. How many track and field records held by biological females must we see erased? How many records of women athletes in weight lifting, cycling, and every other sport will fall to second or third best, all in the name of political correctness?

Joe Biden recently issued an executive order that directly countered Trump administration lawsuits and argument that served to protect biological females from the clear advantages transgender females have in competitive sports. Biden’s actions will stifle opportunities for females in all sports  If one were to assess the harmful effects of Biden’s executive order on women, they would call it what it is – institutional misogyny.

After all, they are asking women to recognize that transgender rights are the new front in the culture war and to be “woke,” even if means destroying women’s sports.

 RWR original article syndication source.

Share this:

What do you think?

Written by Liam Salvatore

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 big thing we still don’t know about the GameStop rally – CNN

Project Veritas Video Shows Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg Downplaying Left-Wing Violence – Breitbart