“The Cleanest Election in History,” Revisited

The election fraud debate halted right after the Capitol riot. Earlier, if you believed the election wasn’t honest, you were “a nut” or “a conspiracy theorist”. Since the riot, if you talked about it you became a plain traitor. An American committing full-on sedition! Everyone who’s been discussing election integrity, or lack of, has been canceledthreatened, and accused of committing crimes against humanity. Even though the Democrats did it for every Republican winner in recent history.

President Trump was impeached for “inciting the insurrection” by repeating that the election was stolen. Perhaps many of his followers believed him. However, I don’t believe the election was stolen because of President Trump’s words. Even being an avid supporter of the President, I never thought that every word that comes out of his mouth is Gospel.  I base my thinking on common sense and research – not on anybody else’s belief.

The most compelling arguments for election fraud are documented here. The arguments presented are compelling politically, historically, and statistically. They have not been challenged. They have not been explained. They have not been disputed. The Capitol riot did not render them invalid.  These arguments are strong, and I continue to refer to them as a basis for my belief that the election was deeply compromised.

It is also worth noting that before Biden was certified as President-Elect, courts refused to hear discovery and dismissed cases brought by Trump and the GOP. The Supreme Court flat-out refused to hear the Texas or Pennsylvania cases which were based on statutory constitutional law. Now that Biden’s inaugural is in the rearview mirror suddenly judges in states that were contested are ruling that statutory laws were violated, read here – media… crickets.

Alleged by an Axios report, shortly after his resignation, former AG Barr came out with the “revelation” that he told President Trump that his legal team “was lying to him about the election fraud”.  The former AG told President Trump that “the fraud committed was not enough to overturn the election.” Well, AG Barr, I accuse you of not doing your job.

First, if you knew “there was fraud committed”, no matter if you thought if that was “enough” – election fraud is a crime. Why didn’t you expose the fraud, AG Barr? Why didn’t you tell us who committed it? Why didn’t you prosecute those people? If the fraud “was not significant enough” then it means we let it go?  That’s lawlessness.

Second, AG Barr, how did you know that “there wasn’t ENOUGH fraud to overturn the election”? Did you have any evidence to prove your assertion?  Why didn’t you present it? Why did you allow “President’s legal team to lie to him and the country”, as you asserted, and not come out and challenge it with evidence that you had? You had full power to stop “the lies”.  Most reasonable people would believe your evidence.  I would. If you could convince me that “the fraud committed would not affect the election result”, and you demonstrated your commitment to rule of law by prosecuting those who committed the fraud, then it would put the matter to rest for me. You did none of that.  You let your country down the path of confusion and distrust, and now we will never know, will we? And people like me will continue to believe the election was stolen, with good reason. My delusion, if it is one, is on YOU, AG Barr. You failed your country.

No matter how much the media dismisses distrust in the result of the 2020 elections, they will never erase it from the minds of a large part of the population in this country. The doubts about the integrity of future elections will persist because the 2020 debacle will hunt us for decades to come. And it is not on President Trump, who had every right to challenge the election (need I remind you Hillary Clinton STILL insists Russia elected Trump?). It’s on the media that crushed the debate, and on law enforcement who failed to investigate and reveal the truth.

Their guy won. The truth does not matter.


 RWR original article syndication source.

Share this:

What do you think?

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Written by Tatyana Larina

Tatyana Larina comes from my favorite work of poetry.  And that's the only time you'll see me quoting Wikipedia as a source.

I came to the US in 1991, lived in Bay Area for 30 years, and I have a Computer Science degree.  I worked in software industry for several years, later switching to a career of a full time mom, and I never looked back.  I am currently a resident of Florida.

In my younger days, I wasn’t a conservative. That is not to say that I was ever a liberal – I was not anything at all. I had no idea that there were such concepts as “conservative” and “liberal”. I did not pay attention to politics at all, and the most political knowledge you would get out of me would be who the US President was, and even for that you had to catch me on the right day.

My first introduction to politics was during the second Israeli intifada in 2002. Unspeakable violence erupted in Israel. Every day dozens of people were killed. Even though I didn’t follow politics, that deeply affected me. I felt sad, frustrated, and powerless. And one night, I happened to stumble on an MSNBC program called “Alan Keyes is making sense.” He was talking passionately about Israel and the violence, and he addressed my feelings very well.  Since that evening, I turned on Alan Keyes every night, and by his commentary he was able to take away some of the frustration and anger that I had. It was like a nightly therapy session.

Feeling intrigued after watching Alan Keyes, I wondered what else MSNBC had in store. I switched through the channels, and low and behold, I found Scarborough Country. Right off, Joe Scarborough wasn’t what he is today at all. He was a solid conservative (as I now understand), making common sense conservative points. I found him interesting and engaging. Opposing liberalism had not entered my mind at that time. I still didn’t know anything about liberalism. It was just the things he said sounded very common sense and worthwhile to me. Imagine that at some point, MSNBC had a conservative host on the air. Crazy times, ha?

Exploring my new political universe, I switched through more channels, and one night I found FOX. O’Reilly Factor was on. From the very first night, I was hooked. I abandoned Scarborough. O’Reilly was not just common sense – he was aggressive, and he was a fighter. He was Scarborough on steroids. He wasn’t just talking – he was taking on what he thought to be wrong and unjust. Ever since the first time, and until untimely end of Bill’s FOX career, I don’t think I ever missed one Factor.

For forming my political views, and my ability to formulate them, I have to give special credit to three people: Charles Krauthammer, Bill O’Reilly, and Greg Guttfeld.  To Charles - philosophy.  To Bill - realistic and pragmatic approach to politics.  To Greg - realization that a good joke will change more minds than a long lecture.

And for everything else, thanks to my family.

‘We need to think more freely’: Bavarian PM mulls producing Sputnik V in Germany as Russian pharma announces investment plans

GOP Sen. Mike Crapo Endorses Amnesty, Foreign Workforce Bill