The Woke Concepts That, By Definition, Are Not Supported by Science or Logic

The woke left tells you they are “the party of science.”  However, if you know anything about science, you understand that nothing they say is supported by any branch of science,  and if you have any reasoning ability at all, you know that nothing they say is rooted in any logic.  The woke left’s ideas are as anti-scientific as ideas can get.

Today, schools and universities no longer teach science or reason. They replaced scientific data with feel-good nonsense, and they substituted critical thinking for virtue signaling. Here are a few concepts that the woke left invented that don’t make any sense in terms of science or logic.

Implicit racism.  “Racism”, by definition, is a belief that one race possesses characteristics that are superior to another race.  A belief cannot be “implicit”.  To be a racist, you have to understand the meaning of superiority and embrace a purposeful idea of superiority of one race over the other.

White culture.  A culture is defined as a set of beliefs and traditions that are embraced by a social community.  “A social community” is a country, a nationality, or a religion.  Any race is comprised of a multitude of such communities, and some communities spread across races.  The idea that members of any one race share a common culture is a fallacy on many scientific levels, as well as an ignorant stereotype.

White privilege. This concept implies that any white homeless person in San Francisco is treated with more respect in society than the Black Lives Matter founder Patrisse Cullors who recently purchased four multi-million dollar houses. You decide if this is true.

Sex is non-binary. There are only two chromosome combinations that determine human sex: XX and XY. There are no other chromosome combinations. That’s “binary”, by definition. “Non-binary” applies to your imagination – not to sex.

Man-made climate change. This is a theory stating that the changes in Earth’s climate are a recent and dangerous natural phenomenon caused by human activity. The proponents of this theory missed multiple ice ages on Earth. Those gigantic manifestations of climate change were not caused by human activity. The Sahara Dessert used to have abundant water and a rich animal population. They won’t tell you that at Columbia, because the transformation into a deadly dessert was not caused by the SUVs.

Cultural appropriation.  Cultures grow and develop by “appropriating”, or sharing, traditions, language, and customs between one another.  Adoption of other cultures’ traditions happened throughout human history because of wars and geographical discoveries, among other historical events.  Cultural “appropriation”, or what is known in anthropology as culture diffusion, is a scientific concept that does not have negative connotations.

Democratic socialism. That is a belief that there is a version of socialism where the government gives you free stuff while you control the government. The only country where this has ever existed was called The Land of Oz. Socialism is a system where the government takes your money, leaves you at the mercy of metered out rations and the bare minimum of food, shelter, and medical care, and puts you in a concentration camp if you object. Any qualifier that is put in front of “socialism” is designed to fool people into accepting a totalitarian system of government.

Mostly false.  The information you state can be either true or false.  If your account contains even one false statement, that effectively deems your account false.  Any lawyer worth their salt will advice you of that before they put you on a stand.

Your truth. Truth is defined by an objective set of facts or events that existed in reality. While one may choose to deny reality, there is still one objective reality happening to everybody and this is known as objective truth. Anything other than one universal truth is either “a belief”, or “an opinion”, or “a pipe dream”.

Science denier. Throughout human history, science has been an ever-evolving concept. If you look up “Flat Earth theory”, “Heliocentric Universe”, and even “Island of California” – these are just some of the theories that were once considered “settled science”, and anybody who challenged them was labeled a heretic, which is an outdated term for “science denier.” “Science deniers” were severely punished by house arrests or burning at the stake, which we all agree is a step just a bit more radical than being banned by Facebook.

Ableism. This concept implies that believing people with no physical defects generally enjoy a better quality of life than people with disabilities is very bad. Do you know who embraces that belief? People with disabilities. While unfair and sad, it is absolutely accurate, and not a hateful stereotype.

The list could go on and on. As long as we have a large segment of our population incapable of applying science and reason and using critical thinking skills – we will have a dysfunctional society. Our government will remain a projection of that culture and continue to perpetuate crisis and incompetence.

So where does that leave the remaining population?

If the remaining sector of our country continues to stand down and enables this regressive self destruction they share in the culpability of the fall of our Republic.

 RWR original article syndication source.

Share this:

What do you think?

Written by Tatyana Larina

Tatyana Larina comes from my favorite work of poetry.  And that's the only time you'll see me quoting Wikipedia as a source.

I came to the US in 1991, lived in San Francisco for 5 years, and I have a Computer Science degree.  I worked in software industry for several years, later switching to a career of a full time mom, and I never looked back.

In my younger days, I wasn’t a conservative. That is not to say that I was ever a liberal – I was not anything at all. I had no idea that there were such concepts as “conservative” and “liberal”. I did not pay attention to politics at all, and the most political knowledge you would get out of me would be who the US President was, and even for that you had to catch me on the right day.
My first introduction to politics was during the second Israeli intifada in 2002. Unspeakable violence erupted in Israel. Every day dozens of people were killed. Even though I didn’t follow politics, that deeply affected me. I felt sad, frustrated, and powerless. And one night, I happened to stumble on an MSNBC program called “Alan Keyes is making sense.” He was talking passionately about Israel and the violence, and he addressed my feelings very well.  Since that evening, I turned on Alan Keyes every night, and by his commentary he was able to take away some of the frustration and anger that I had. It was like a nightly therapy session.
Feeling intrigued after watching Alan Keyes, I wondered what else MSNBC had in store. I switched through the channels, and low and behold, I found Scarborough Country. Right off, Joe Scarborough wasn’t what he is today at all. He was a solid conservative (as I now understand), making common sense conservative points. I found him interesting and engaging. Opposing liberalism had not entered my mind at that time. I still didn’t know anything about liberalism. It was just the things he said sounded very common sense and worthwhile to me. Imagine that at some point, MSNBC had a conservative host on the air. Crazy times, ha?
Exploring my new political universe, I switched through more channels, and one night I found FOX. O’Reilly Factor was on. From the very first night, I was hooked. I abandoned Scarborough. O’Reilly was not just common sense – he was aggressive, and he was a fighter. He was Scarborough on steroids. He wasn’t just talking – he was taking on what he thought to be wrong and unjust. Ever since the first time, and until untimely end of Bill’s FOX career, I don’t think I ever missed one Factor.
For forming my political views, and my ability to formulate them, I have to give special credit to three people: Charles Krauthammer, Bill O’Reilly, and Greg Guttfeld.  To Charles - philosophy.  To Bill - realistic and pragmatic approach to politics.  To Greg - realization that a good joke will change more minds than a long lecture.
And for everything else, thanks to my family.

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Indianapolis gunman fired randomly, say police

boycott

Is it Time to Boycott Business that Support Radical Left-Wing Policies?