Eleven Days before leaving office President Obama’s administration re-authorized funding for the creation of biological weapons using SARS viruses.
Did that sink in yet? This is the Right Wire Report editor’s choice for the most important story of the week! Please make the effort and take the time to click on documentation contained within the article – these are official documents. Our additional summary of data follows the article.
The Last Refuge:
Okay, straight talk. This discovery makes the suspicions of an intentionally released Pandemic virus, with a political intent, to “STOP TRUMP” look exponentially more plausible. SARS = Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, the deadly consequence within COVID-19.
With people beginning to recognize that U.S. government officials and the intelligence community have been less than honest, and in some cases downright lying, surrounding the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and when we overlay the political motives in the background of mass narrative deflection from media and other institutions; and when we consider the known lengths that people inside the U.S. government were willing to go in their efforts to eliminate President Trump; discovering that President Obama’s administration technically authorized the restart of “gain of function” research (biological weaponization of SARS virus) just days before President Trump took office… is way more than alarming. My hunch is this link might even disappear [SEE HERE]
January 9, 2017 – “lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen’s virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP).” (link)
An even larger backstory. Eleven Days before leaving office President Obama’s administration re-authorized funding for the creation of biological weapons using SARS viruses. However, essentially this re-authorization was only kickstarting funding within the U.S. because the funding of weaponization of SARS-CoV-2 never actually stopped in 2014. The media reporting on this is misleading, if not downright false.
[U.S. Government Gain-of-Function Deliberative Process and Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses – pdf, page 2 – October 17, 2014]
This exception essentially permitted the Pentagon to continue funding the creation of SARS as a biological weapon in Wuhan, China, under the auspices of national security. Which is exactly what the defense department did: “Grants from the Pentagon included $6,491,025 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from 2017 to 2020” (link).
♦ October 17, 2014 – U.S. funding of SARS to create a biological weapon was paused due to the extreme risk of a pandemic. However, the pause allowed agencies within the U.S. government to continue funding if they determined “the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.”
♦ 2014 through 2020 the Pentagon continued funding research in Wuhan, China. Fear of discovery would explain why many top officials in the U.S. Defense Department were against the Trump administration [with increased severity after the COVID pandemic began].
♦ May 2016 – [An Election Year] “after thorough deliberation and extensive input from domestic and international stakeholders, the NSABB [National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity] issued its recommendations. NSABB’s central finding was that studies that are expected to enhance PPP have potential benefits to public health but also entail significant risks. NSABB recommended that such studies warranted additional scrutiny prior to being funded.” Anthony Fauci is on the NSABB.
♦ January 9, 2017 – [Four Days after the Susan Rice oval office meeting with Obama, Biden, Comey, et al] The Obama Administration re-authorizes funding for the creation of SARS biological weapons. “Adoption of these recommendations will satisfy the requirements for lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen’s virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP).“
Given the workarounds, exceptions and plausible deniability for the consequences, built into the original moratorium guidance in 2014, the defense department was operationally permitted to keep funding the biological weapons research in Wuhan, China. The 2014 ban was a funding moratorium in name only; however, it appears the funding for U.S. research in North Carolina was stopped.
What was reauthorized in 2017 was the need to use “national security” as an excuse to continue the research. It also appears funding of SARS as a biological weapon inside the U.S. (North Carolina) was now permitted again.
SUMMARY: President Obama (not Trump) started the reauthorization of SARS-CoV-2 Virus experimentation in 2017. The funding of the Wuhan Lab for the creation of SARS-CoV-2 was originated during the Obama administration and continued during the Trump administration. The scientific community, the Obama White House and National Security Team, and the Pentagon knew the dangers of funding the weaponization of a biological weapon from SARS. The COVID-19 pandemic was an outcome of these originating decisions.
…. and yes, there are political and ideological benefits from the perspective of Obama’s ideological group for unleashing the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic as an opportunistic “crisis” to create totalitarian government solutions regardless of who was in office. However, the timing of the subsequent biological release is very suspicious in relation to the 2020 presidential election and the downstream benefits of manipulating the election via mail-in ballots.
Perhaps not a smoking gun of intent, but definitely bloody footprints walking out the door – in Obama’s size.
Note the date:
Right Wire Report Editors note:
The subject matter at hand is complicated, to say the least. The average person does not have the time or motivation to gather all the crumbs and seek answers to REAL questions yet answered. Connecting dots can be exhausting and we freely admit not all dots or crumbs are always accurately characterized. But at this juncture in this global tragedy- it is past time for citizens to stop ignoring or dismissing all dots. The Right Wire Report has attempted to create a one article portal to assist all with getting up to speed and at least start grasping the questions which must be addressed.
One thing is certain -what exactly has happened to the world population over the last year is NOT the narrative we have all been told. Narratives pushed by world health organizations, global governance bodies, governments, politicians, and the media.
Are the events criminal and or nefarious or sheer ideologically driven incompetence, or both? We cannot determine presently. But no longer can the label conspiracy whacko stop those who are ready to gather all known facts and variables and begin asking the right questions and demanding answers.
There have been two different batches of Dr. Fauci’s email batches released from FOI requests over the last 72 hrs. Please watch a review of what they said here:
Do you know who Dr. Anthony Fauci’s wife is?
“Christine Grady, MSN, Ph.D., is Fauci’s colleague at the National Institute of Health, where she serves as chief of bioethics and head of human subjects research at the NIH Clinical Center. According to the Center’s website, Grady’s contributions are “primarily in the ethics of clinical research, including informed consent, vulnerability, study design, recruitment, and international research ethics, as well as ethical issues faced by nurses and other health care providers.
Why was Grady ever placed in a position at the NIH, where she was the final arbiter of the ethics of her husband’s experiments? If Fauci wanted to study gain-of-function research on lethal viruses, did he just need to roll over in bed and say, “Honey, is this OK?” to obtain “ethical” permission?”
“Federal CDC announced all U.S. healthcare providers must switch to new rapid response tests for COVID-19. The reasoning? The current PCR test does not differentiate between COVID and the flu. The new tests will distinguish between the flu virus and the COVID virus.”
Here is Senator Rand Paul exposing Dr. Fauci on “Gain of Function” research:
Please watch the most recent interview with Chinese virologist, Dr. Li-Meng Yun on Tucker Carlson two weeks ago here. ( 2nd video on page)
UPDATE added 06/10/21
Congressman Matt Gaetz (FL-1) has grilled FBI director Christopher Wray on the origins of the coronavirus and what Wray and his FBI knew as Chinese defector/whistleblower Dr. Yan entered the United States in April 2020.
If you want to connect dots – you must understand all the players. This is an excellent review of who and what entities are in play including, EVENT 201.
Event 201,”The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY.”
From their website:” simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.”
Dr. Judy Mikovitch alleges serious charges against Dr. Fauci. PLANDEMIC Documentary:
Catherine Austin Fitts is an American investment banker and former public official who served as managing director of Dillon, Read & Co., and as the United States Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Housing during the George H.W. Bush administration. In a must-watch video, she gives her perspective and further explanation of what The Great Reset looks like.
Here is RWR article on the Great Reset.
This is the video produced for the World Economic Forum:
Watch global leaders and elites tell you how the pandemic crisis allowed an opportunity to choose a different path, a great reset. Note that the Green Energy Deal is part of this reset.
If you take time to review the information in this article it could consume up to two hours of your day or over some time frame you choose.
Is two hours too much time to become informed on a broad number of factors that impact one of the most significant events, ongoing, in your lifetime? Is it too much for you to educate yourself on certain facts, and after doing so, if you deem pertinent will you choose, to push for answers from your politicians and demand journalists to hold authoritative powers to task with full investigative actions?
If you are one who thinks all the headlines above are Right Wing Nuttery-is it too much for you to review the material if only to effectively debunk it if possible?
No matter what category you fit in just how much time is too much time to ensure you did your part in securing the freedoms for future generations?
Please, consider the investment and read and view the material.