Charles Blow: Another New York Times Opinion Piece Further Shows How Out Of Touch Journalists Are

On Sunday, September 13th, an opinion piece by Charles M. Blow was published by The New York Times. The article, “Writing for the Poor,” lamented the poverty-stricken life of a woman in rural northern Louisiana. She was Blow’s aunt whom the author declared, was:

desperately poor, like many people I knew in rural north Louisiana. I don’t know how much money she had or made. I only know the shadow of need that stalked her. She seemed, like many members of my family, one paycheck or severe injury away from insolvency.”

He described her home disparagingly—starving dogs in the yard, foul odors emitting from rooms, waist-high weeds for a lawn.  The reasons for this? According to Blow, the usual suspects: “patriarchy, racism, mass incarceration, craven capitalism.”

Blow viewed his aunt as a “disposable” person who “had little money and wielded little power.” The author himself was poor once but no longer—he queried himself about how he could help his aunt. He concluded rather than show personal generosity toward her, he’d focus on “public policy and indifference. The best thing I could do was advocate for all.” He didn’t want to reach in his own pocket to help his aunt, rather his solution is to pull from the public’s coffers.

Charles M. Blow, Author Info, Published Books, Bio, Photo ...

Missing from the opinion piece was personal responsibility, however, Blow gave some insight into the cause of his aunt’s poverty: “My aunt died in hock to payday lenders, having taken out loans to get the men in her life out of trouble and keep them out, but all the while she sank further and further into debt and despair. And the lenders profited from that pain.” So, his aunt’s decision to take on more debt by borrowing money to help the men in her life isn’t the cause of her pain? According to Blow, it’s the lenders.

The reason the piece in The Times is important is that it demonstrates some writer’s inability to look at a situation from all sides. Blow wants us to pity his aunt and not hold her accountable for the life she led. Why couldn’t she cut the grass and feed the dogs or find a home for them? Why did she tolerate foul odors coming from the rooms in her home? How did mass incarceration have anything to do with her dismal financial situation?

Blow’s aunt was the single most important cause of her unfortunate situation, not the society surrounding her.

If you found this article informative, please consider a small donation to our coffee cup to help support Conservative Journalism – or spread the word. Thank you.

 RWR original article syndication source.

Share this:

What do you think?

Written by Bascott O'Connor

2 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. That’s what the left does. “This person is POOR so it must be somebody’s fault! It’s white supremacy, or sexism, or capitalism, that made them poor!” 90% of the time, a person’s poverty is a result of THEIR OWN CHOICES. But the left is playing on emotions – “Look at this person’s terrible life! It must be SOMEBODY’S fault. Probably YOURS!”
    Bay Area liberals buy it hook line and sinker. They are living in multi million dollar houses fully believing that they cause the world’s poverty, and what’s more disturbing is they believe displaying “Black Lives Matter” front yard sign is a repayment for that sin.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

South Korean regulator slaps Google with $177mn fine for antitrust violations & abusing market dominance

Coronavirus: Chinese embassy urges nationals not to travel to Singapore as singer JJ Lin makes clear he’s not linked to Fujian outbreak