Sex Strikes: Liberals Get Lost in Their Own Twisted Logic, Once Again

“Women” of Tik- Tok speak:

  • Women of TikTok: “Ban abortions? Ok, cool. We are not having sex!  That means no babies – even better!”

The First unintended consequence of Texas abortion law: women of TikTok just discovered that abstinence is a legitimate and effective method of birth control.

  • Women of TikTok: “Women are fine with “not having sex.”

The Second unintended consequence of Texas abortion law: women of TikTok just discovered that men and women are biologically different.  Otherwise, why would women be fine without sex, and men would not be?

  • Women of TikTok: “Texas banned abortions, and that means I will not be sleeping with my partner, and you should not be sleeping with your male-identifying partner.”

First rule of life: sleeping with any “male-identifying” person, of any gender, is a really bad idea, regardless of that person’s stand on Texas abortion law.

Second rule of life:  the only women who ever call for “sex strikes” are those nobody wants to have sex with in the first place.  It’s like they want to level the playing field.

Case in point: Bette Midler.

Seriously, does Bette Midler declaring a sex strike seem like a threat to anybody? Seems like an incentive to me. I think Beth Midler’s “male-identifying partner” just went: “I didn’t support Texas abortion law, but if that gets me off the hook of having sex with Bette then I am calling for abortion laws in every state!”

Ms. Midler’s tweet highlighting Biden’s failure to protect Afghanistan’s women from the Taliban “Hand Maidens” is… non-existent. Perhaps she will tweet that Afghani women should withhold sex next?

But I digress.  For years, the #MeToo crowd and other similarly enlightened feminist organizations decried any notion of a woman as a sexual being.  Women’s sexuality should never be a topic of conversation, they told us.  It is a crime against humanity to suggest that a woman’s body should be mentioned in any conversation, in any way.

I am glad that’s out the window. No matter how far the women’s movement progresses – whenever a liberal woman runs out of sound arguments, it’s back to the age-old “it’s my way, or you are not getting any,” once again.

If you found this article informative, please consider a small donation to our coffee cup to help support Conservative Journalism – or spread the word. Thank you.

 RWR original article syndication source.

Share this:

What do you think?


Leave a Reply
    • Well here I go…if a cow stands in my kitchen holding a butchers knife and has marked his flanks to read ” eat me”…I am calling fair dibs on that suicidal side of beef!
      So , when person’s of any gender make a sexual act and their ability to engage in that act the focus while at the same time presenting themselves as they truly appear and act … I am handing out get out of misogyny jail cards out FREE! LOL.

  1. These women do not represent fair equity and representation for women much less empowerment. Every time these faux feminist’s use their biological realities as victim cards I cringe. The burdens upon them are not related to their unique lady bits but solely their emotional and Intellectual IQ.

    Screeching “my body my choice” then using your body’s sexual choices as a penalty box for those you disagree with seems rather consensual lunacy – yes?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Written by Tatyana Larina

Tatyana Larina comes from my favorite work of poetry.  And that's the only time you'll see me quoting Wikipedia as a source.

I came to the US in 1991, lived in Bay Area for 30 years, and I have a Computer Science degree.  I worked in software industry for several years, later switching to a career of a full time mom, and I never looked back.  I am currently a resident of Florida.

In my younger days, I wasn’t a conservative. That is not to say that I was ever a liberal – I was not anything at all. I had no idea that there were such concepts as “conservative” and “liberal”. I did not pay attention to politics at all, and the most political knowledge you would get out of me would be who the US President was, and even for that you had to catch me on the right day.

My first introduction to politics was during the second Israeli intifada in 2002. Unspeakable violence erupted in Israel. Every day dozens of people were killed. Even though I didn’t follow politics, that deeply affected me. I felt sad, frustrated, and powerless. And one night, I happened to stumble on an MSNBC program called “Alan Keyes is making sense.” He was talking passionately about Israel and the violence, and he addressed my feelings very well.  Since that evening, I turned on Alan Keyes every night, and by his commentary he was able to take away some of the frustration and anger that I had. It was like a nightly therapy session.

Feeling intrigued after watching Alan Keyes, I wondered what else MSNBC had in store. I switched through the channels, and low and behold, I found Scarborough Country. Right off, Joe Scarborough wasn’t what he is today at all. He was a solid conservative (as I now understand), making common sense conservative points. I found him interesting and engaging. Opposing liberalism had not entered my mind at that time. I still didn’t know anything about liberalism. It was just the things he said sounded very common sense and worthwhile to me. Imagine that at some point, MSNBC had a conservative host on the air. Crazy times, ha?

Exploring my new political universe, I switched through more channels, and one night I found FOX. O’Reilly Factor was on. From the very first night, I was hooked. I abandoned Scarborough. O’Reilly was not just common sense – he was aggressive, and he was a fighter. He was Scarborough on steroids. He wasn’t just talking – he was taking on what he thought to be wrong and unjust. Ever since the first time, and until untimely end of Bill’s FOX career, I don’t think I ever missed one Factor.

For forming my political views, and my ability to formulate them, I have to give special credit to three people: Charles Krauthammer, Bill O’Reilly, and Greg Guttfeld.  To Charles - philosophy.  To Bill - realistic and pragmatic approach to politics.  To Greg - realization that a good joke will change more minds than a long lecture.

And for everything else, thanks to my family.

China’s first C919 aircraft bound for China Eastern Airlines to enter final assembly

US politicians duel over Afghanistan war’s disastrous legacy