Dr. Fauci’s History of Manipulating Data: Inflating Flu Numbers to Promote Universal Mandatory Vaccines

Recently a  2019 video has surfaced of Dr. Fauci with HHS officials and other health experts discussing their frustrations related to how long it takes a vaccine to get to market and intimating the desire to find a way forward to enforce Universal Flu Vaccinations globally.

Three specific highlights from the video taken from a panel discussion at the Milken Institute in D.C. in October 2019, only months before COVID -19  became a known entity can be viewed here:

The entire panel discussion for context can be reviewed here.

Let’s look at this quote specifically:

Michael Specter: ” Why don’t we blow the system up? I mean obviously, we can’t just turn off the spigot on the system. We have and then say, hey everyone in the world should get this new vaccine that we haven’t given to anyone yet. But there must be some way that we grow vaccines mostly in eggs the way we did in 1947.”

There is no ambiguity here that Specter and the rest of the speakers are expressing extreme frustration with the limitations placed upon the way vaccine research is conducted and the time frames required to a) get the product into the hosts and b) recoup and or generate sales for the product. Now, one could step back and attempt to make the case that these “experts” are only laser-focused on relieving human suffering, and finding a way to cut through as many obstacles or red tape as possible is but a noble endeavor. But this assumption would require viewing these statements made above in a vacuum. What key factors matter when inclusion beyond the singular discussion is present?

  • Research Funding both private and government sourced.
  • Patents /investing.
  • Marketing Propaganda.
  • Mandatory vaccine populations ( Military, Healthcare providers, federal employees, Large corporate employees) equals guaranteed profits.

Now, take three minutes or so to watch this montage and make certain to  read the summary at the end of the video that scrolls across the screen:


Yes, Conflict of interest matters when determining motives and intentions. In light of this recently surfaced video let us review what we know about the CDC’s history of promoting and marketing vaccines. For decades the Centers for Disease Control ( CDC) has had a track record of inflating Flu numbers to advance the marketing reach and financial benefits. Many are concerned the same data manipulation is happening with the pandemic.

Key points:

  • There are serious questions about the way Covid deaths have been counted, here is an in-depth analysis of this concern.
  • There are serious questions about the accuracy and reliability of Covid testing for concluding infection rates, see here here, and here.
  • There are serious questions about monetary incentives for Covid diagnosis, see here and here.
  • During the Delta variant spike, specific Delta variant testing was not utilized to differentiate from Covid-19 in medical faculties, see here.
  • There are more deaths in the USA in 2021 after vaccinations, than in 2020.
  • More Vaccinated are getting sick in breakthrough cases.
  • Comparable to other Influenza seasons the CDC data reflects almost non -existent Flu numbers, here and here.
  • Note the CDC language “Flu activity was unusually low throughout the 2020-2021 flu season both in the United States and globally, despite high levels of testing.” How many were tested with Covid tests for symptoms but reported as Influenza tests negative and Covid positive? Remember the issue the FDA found with lack of differentiation of specific virus showing positive results.
  • The Influenza vaccines have about 30-40% efficacy and some years less than that. The flu vaccine for the 2018–2019 season was only 29% effective and the vaccine for the 2014-15 flu season was only 19% effective. The Covid vaccines are reporting waning efficacy as well.
  • The survival rate for Covid under the age of 85 is 99%.
  • The average age of death from COVID is 78. The average life expectancy in America is 78.
  • 79% of more than 600,000  plus deaths in the U.S. were over the age of 65
  • 4,493 fully vaccinated persons have died from Covid in the USA.
  • For over  20 years, “the pharmaceutical and health products industry has spent the most money of all industries in lobbying spending.”
  • A review of the # 30 Covid Questions ( Links)

So let us look back to what we knew in 2020 about Dr. Fauci and the CDC’s propensity to be dishonest when pushing vaccines and compare with all we have learned to date.

From an article I wrote in 2020: Flu Numbers Inflated for Decades, a DEEP DIVE into the Conflicts of Interests:

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) are tasked with informing the public on the number of patients dying from Coronavirus, among other aspects of infection control. Why does the CDC report the Mortality Surveillance numbers for this crisis by lumping vital statistic reports for Pneumonia, Influenza, and COVID-19 together? Is their goal to produce a larger number as COVID-19 attributed deaths, only to break out in detail buried deep in the data? Consider the following chart from 2020:

This graph shows pneumonia and influenza (P&I) mortality data provided to CDC by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Mortality Reporting System.



Denoted on the left side of the graph – the index states, “percent of deaths due to Pneumonia, Influenza OR COVID-19.” The media and political left have been scrambling to censor and dismiss any notion that not ALL death certificates (vital statistics) are patients who died from the pathogen COVID-19. Despite startling evidence that some, certainly not all, death certificates may not be accurate. Several physicians have raised concerns that the CDC guidelines instruct that a COVID-19 positive test (even post-mortem) is not required when completing the death certificate as COVID-19. Right Wire Report wonders what possible rationale would there be to provisionally assume the cause of death when one can test before or after expiring, even collecting a tissue sample for testing at a later date, to confirm the diagnosis.

Here is just a small sample of physicians who have addressed their concerns over vital statistic manipulation data entry on COVID-19 death certificates – see herehere, and here. These three reports have been taken down off YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook since going public. Recently the Pennsylvania Coroners identified deceased COVID-19 persons who, upon closer review, did not die from COVID-19. This resulted in the slashing of the numbers attributed to the pathogen. Project Veritas uncovered additional disturbing information:

Consider before Coronavirus between 20 – 30 percent of all Death Certificates nationwide were not correctly classified (audit). Where are all the normal seasonal Influenza deaths this year being counted post the COVID-19 (Jan 2020)?  Flu season starts in October and runs through May each year in the United States. This 2019-2020 season had been virulently leading up to January, and suddenly, the CDC numbers dramatically plummeted. Right Wire Report did a story on this issue here. Additionally, the latest news out of Italy points to serious flaws in recording deaths accurately. Watch a fiery speech by a politician explaining this latest information here. Consider the following excerpt:

“On re-evaluation by the National Institute of Health, only 12 percent of death certificates have shown a direct causality from Coronavirus, while 88 percent of patients who have died have at least one pre-morbidity – many had two or three,” says Prof Ricciardi, Scientific adviser to Italy’s minister of health.

So at this juncture, we have at least established a serious review is needed on how the CDC and the John Hopkins data – and the downstream organizations have been utilizing vital statistics and keep pumping out alarming death rate numbers on a website ticker for all to see. But now let us turn to the question, why muddy the stats at the CDC in the first place, and is there any precedent for doing so?

Well, it just so happens there is!

Rather than repeat excellent analysis already assembled by Epoch Times in November of 2018, by Jeremy R, Hammond ( “How the CDC Uses Fear To Increase Demand for Flu Vaccines“) – Right Wire Report directs you to take the time to read through the piece. The way the CDC uses modeling to estimate annual Influenza death and what constitutes a Flu death has been skewed and inaccurate for over a decade. They presently apply the same methodology reporting COVID-19 deaths and projections.

When did this bundling of flu and Pneumonia deaths start? Looking closer, the CDC began “playing up flu deaths” over a decade ago when the manufacturers of vaccines complained about not having enough orders being placed for the product. The CDC also observed the public response to getting the flu vaccine unacceptable. The action plan by the CDC was known as the “Seven-Step Recipe,” which was presented at the 2004 National Influenza Vaccine Summit. Below is a graphic that was shown at this presentation.

The CDC outlined a “Recipe for Fostering Public Interest and High Vaccine Demand.” No, you are reading correctly, the CDC was marketing the vaccine and manipulating numbers of hospitalizations and deaths contributed to Influenza to hype fear. The media was also complicit in doing so. Glen Nowak, CDC’s acting director of media relations, was the frontman and even went on Public Radio to pimp his marketing plan, saying, “It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get the flu shot.” The public had no clue that the numbers were only estimations based on faulty and manipulated modeling.

In 2004, Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the National Vaccine Information Center, (not funded by vaccine producers) stated:

“We have known for several years that the CDC is employing behaviorists and communications specialists to instill fear and anxiety in public about infectious diseases in order to promote mass vaccination. But the rhetoric about flu risks has been especially over the top,” “The public is not being well-served by federal health officials who use deceptive propaganda techniques to panic people into standing in lines to get flu vaccine rather than tell them the real truth about flu risks as well as vaccine risks.”

The flu death rates on their own did not create enough risk to support the flu vaccine’s high usage. Sound familiar? The object was to produce a high enough threshold of death and hospitalizations to warrant mass numbers of vaccines needed. The Epoch Times article above mentions Dr.  Peter Doshi, who, as a Graduate student at the time, wrote, “Are US death figures more PR than science?” The article is laden with stats and worth the read, but he concludes:

“If flu is, in fact, not a major cause of death, this public relations approach is surely exaggerated. Moreover, by arbitrarily linking flu with Pneumonia, current data are statistically biased. Until corrected and until unbiased statistics are developed, the chances for sound discussion and public health policy are limited.”

Later while doing his postdoctoral work, Doshi wrote, “Influenza: Marketing Vaccine by Marketing Disease:”

“…across the country, mandatory Influenza vaccination policies have cropped up, particularly in healthcare facilities, precisely because not everyone wants the vaccination, and compulsion appears the only way to achieve high vaccination rates. Closer examination of Influenza vaccine policies shows that although proponents employ the rhetoric of science, the studies underlying the policy are often of low quality, and do not substantiate officials’ claims. The vaccine might be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of Influenza appears overstated.”

The health care industry alone purchase large volumes of vaccines for employees annually, universities, and Corporate well programs do the same. It was just a few years ago that our local Walgreens started giving the shot in the store, and other chains followed suit. The marketing campaign was working and creating a multi-billion dollar business model. For more stats, read  Dr.Tom Jefferson’s take on the matter.

The articles are deep in the weeds at times, but what emerged is a clear picture that explains much of the glaring red flags many of us pick up on presently with how the numbers and policy objectives during this COVID-19 crisis make no sense. Here are some key points to drill down on:

1. Most pneumonia deaths are unrelated to Influenza.

The American Lung Association has more than 30 different causes of Pneumonia, Influenza being but one of them. For example, “stomach acid-suppressing drugs are associated with a higher risk of community-acquired pneumonia, but such drugs and pneumonia are not compiled as a single statistic,” explained Dr. David Rosenthal, director of Harvard University Health Services. “People don’t necessarily die, per se, of the [flu] virus – the viraemia. What they die of is secondary Pneumonia.” Elderly patients with late-stage Alzheimer’s, usually in nursing home settings, have great difficulty swallowing and aspirate, often leading to Pneumonia.

The CDC itself acknowledges the slim relationship, saying “only a small proportion of deaths … only 8.5 percent of all pneumonia and influenza deaths [are] Influenza related.” If the CDC has been bundling Pneumonia deaths with Influenza data for a decade and now is doing the same with COVID-19, there can be no credible determination of primary vs. secondary cause of death. A significant percentage of Influenza deaths before COVID -19 was Pneumonia unrelated to viraemia and many bacterial. The CDC even created the sound-alike term, “Influenza-associated death.” Why can we not assume the same pattern is happening in present reporting?

2. CDC enlists computer models to arrive at its flu-death estimate annually.

In September 2018, the CDC claimed 80,000 people died from the flu during the 2017 – 2018 flu season.

“What is not being communicated to the public is that the CDC’s numbers do not represent known cases of Influenza. They do not come directly from surveillance data, but are rather controversial estimates based on controversial mathematical models that may greatly overestimate the numbers.”

When pressed on that number compared to actual death certificates denoting Influenza as the cause of death, the CDC fell back on a sliding scale estimate of anywhere from  3,000 and 49,000 yearly deaths on average and as many as up to 80,000 on above-average estimates. For the last decade, the CDC was never claiming a precise number of persons dying from Influenza only a presumed estimate based on models they create, and only they enter data points.

Presently, with COVID-19, there is a body attached to each number. The CDC reports the variance here is the bundling of three possible reasons, being Influenza, Pneumonia, or COVID-19. The truth is the media only speak of that number as emphatic COVID-19 causation. The CDC just put out their 2019 – 2020 Influenza deaths, and the estimated spread was as low as 24 k and as high as 62 k.  Wow, talk about wiggle room!

Dr. Birx admitted to the very liberal counting of  COVID-19 deaths – listen for yourself in the following video:

The Washington Post reported on May 10th that Dr. Birx, in a heated exchange behind closed doors, stated that she could not trust any of the numbers coming out of the CDC. Reportedly she questioned the antiquated systems the CDC uses to track deaths and infections and felt they could be inflated as much as 25%.

3. Flu vaccines often fail and do not work against all strains of Influenza.

Vaccines run about 30-40% efficacy and some years less than that. They are formulated annually based on what the CDC advises. For decades, tests suggested the flu vaccine worked extremely well, but in the past 15 years, a better test revealed many infections in vaccinated people who would previously have been deemed protected.

4. There is a monetary consideration to assigning a diagnosis of COVID-19 in Medicare and Medicaid patients. Medicare is determining that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital, you get $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000, three times as much.

Now consider over more than 50% of COVID-19 recorded deaths are from Nursing Homes, and a large percentage of minorities (high % Medicaid) with comorbidity are also largely represented in the death counts.

5. Now the focus is on numbers to justify massive efforts to find a vaccine to give to the world.

There are many key players in both the decades-long flu vaccine push/hype and the present – day COVID-19  crisis, who now overlap. Their names are commonly written about on a daily basis and reflect the immense conflict of interests each appears to have. One of the most visible is Bill Gates. Recently he was interviewed and stated:

“My Foundation is focusing all efforts on discovering a vaccine and until we find a vaccine life cannot and will not return to normal.” Gates used to be the second larger funder of the World Health Organization, but since the USA has held all funding, he is now number one.

The vaccine market is a 35 billion dollar industry!

Right Wire Report does not claim to be medical or scientific experts. But if one takes the time to review the data contained in the links and analysis from the experts therein, we stand behind the obvious conclusion. The CDC, NIH, and most research facilities/universities have become too politicized and personally monetized to be entirely effective in protecting the public from infectious diseases.

The incentives to play loose and mold outcomes with data-driven models used to establish policies and protocols has weakened the credibility of the institutions. And finally, there should be zero need to bundle diseases when reporting on the cause of death or not testing  (vital statistics), and absolutely no rationale for deploying such tactics and social media platform censoring information or labeling voices as conspiracy theories if the true goal is to deliver the best practices and standard of care.

If it is what it appears to be, there are directed measures in play to produce the largest number of deaths assigned as COVID-19. Taking advantage of the in-progress Influenza season, the normal rate of pneumonia-related deaths in the elderly, and steady rates of comorbidity related deaths in minorities to pad the body count would be unconscionable. However, it would be rather easy to accomplish in the fog of media-driven hysteria and past conduct and practices with Influenza stats. If Right Wire Report is over the target, this should never be allowed to stand.

Today, observing Dr. Fauci and others obfuscating, fabricating, and misleading the public routinely. When placed in the context of the NIH’s funding gain of research at the Wuhan Lab and other financial conflicts of interest rabbit holes- it is abundantly clear the American people have not been served well during this pandemic.

Why has the public been lied to with such impunity? This is a most uncomfortable question to ponder. And how far back have these ” scientific experts” been bastardizing the data to manipulate  the population to partake in vaccines?

If you found this article informative, please consider a small donation to our coffee cup to help support Conservative Journalism – or spread the word. Thank you.

 RWR original article syndication source.




Share this:

What do you think?

Written by Bekah Lyons

"The simple step of a courageous individual is to not take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world." Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

I was born and raised in the enigma known as "The Big Easy." There, rooted along the banks of the great Mississippi River between the creeping bayou and Lake Pontchartrain, I was conscripted on all things pertaining to human nature.  I am the quintessential southern woman, that is to say, I defy most could never accurately define what that label truly represents.  Brined below sea level where one respects; the haunts lingering about, the force of storm surge, the ethos of Mardi Gras, and the sanctity of generational family-I know what it is to belong to an organically diverse culture.

Early on in life, my career path serpentined and led to brief stints of living varied experiences as I indulged my passions for painting, musical theater, and the culinary arts. My young experiences evolved my purpose and honed my intuitive skills and I became a Medical Professional specializing in mental health with a focus on child/adolescent needs. After living decades in NOLA, and after hurricane  Katrina unearthed the realities of modern-day inner cities, I made the pivotal decision to relocate to where my family and I spent our summers in a quest to find security and civility in my life.

High up on one of the "grandfather mountains" I now perch in a Smoky mountain community in East Tennessee. Although, I would not trade my formative years in Louisiana, unfortunately,  that era of  America  is  no longer obtainable in the times we live - changing course was the best decision "Evah!"

I am a warrior  for freedom and truth , steeped in my ancestral history ,I am constantly reminded that stillness and introspection expands the mind and heart to possess a more nuanced understanding of all things in our internal and external world. We are all destined to bash ourselves against the rotted cultural rocks of humanity's unraveling until we recognize that a shared moral tone is essential for a free society. A healthy culture is one comprised of many unique people who offer shading and depth to the experience of living, yet all choose to accept basic truths that bind us all together-a societal moral tone. Intolerance  , censorship, intersectionality, cancel culture, apathy ,and ignorance will only groom oppression and tyranny.  Critical thought, differentiation, and dissent is your individual right granted not by government -and must always be protected, championed, and defended.


Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Too Short Apologizes for ‘Colorist’ Comments, Says All Shades Beautiful

Some Major City Newspapers Indict Jon Gruden With Their Headlines