Gavin Newsom’s Bullet Train, Like California, Is Once Again Veering Off Track

Just like Bill Clinton’s affairs and Hillary Clinton’s presidential runs, California’s high-speed rail infrastructure nightmare keeps popping up in the news every few years.

In 2008, California residents approved ballot measure 1A to start construction of a high-speed railroad connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles in under 3 hours.

In December of 2018, The Hoover Institution reported:

“Governor Jerry Brown will leave… a legacy of presiding over one of the biggest public policy failures in the state’s history. The California High-Speed Rail project began in 2008 at an estimated cost of about $39 billion to build high-speed train service between Northern California, Southern California, and the Central Valley. Despite the project having been significantly scaled back, the price tag for the down-sized system is likely approaching $100 billion. The first passengers to ride on the key Los Angeles–San Francisco route are projected to board no earlier than 2033, which is a four-year delay over and above previous delays. After California has spent roughly $5.4 billion, the bullet train is going nowhere fast.”

Even the far-left Los Angeles Times blasted the “bullet train” fiasco, blaming it for inflicting a “trail of grief” on poor residents of rural California:

“California history is replete with cases of highways, ports and water projects displacing poor people, who lacked the clout to fight the government. The California high-speed rail project pledged to do better. But up and down the San Joaquin Valley, the bullet train is hitting hard at people who are already struggling to survive tough economic conditions in one of the poorest regions in the nation.”

The California bullet train quest is akin to socialism: everyone who takes another shot at it claims all who tried it before failed because they, just weren’t doing it right.

Gavin Newsom’s latest budget proposal pumps yet another 4.2 billion smackers into the “bullet” monstrosity.  Another far-left newspaper, San Jose Mercury News, is skeptical:

“But the proposed $4.2 billion in high-speed rail funding has been mired in controversy. It is the final tranche of $9.9 billion in bond funds for the high-speed rail, which voters approved in 2008’s Proposition 1A on the promise that they would see a bullet train connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco in two hours and 40 minutes. At the moment, that’s not what voters are getting.

Instead, Newsom is seeking to secure the $4.2 billion to finish a 119-mile segment in Fresno, Kern, Madera, and Kings counties, even as some Democrats say the funding should be used for projects aimed at urban centers in the Bay Area and Southern California, not a less-populated stretch of the Central Valley.”

If you are wondering where Fresno, Kern, Madera, and King counties are – so is the rest of America. These are rural counties lacking large populations centers. They are, as LA Times reported, very scarcely populated by California’s poorest residents, who are still wondering who is going to ride their dopey train.

Gavin Newsom keeps coming up with creative new ways to waste his “unprecedented budget surplus” (courtesy of Joe Biden’s “Covid Relief” blue states bailout plan).  There is scarcely enough money for all Gavin’s socialist wet dreams that keep Mark Zuckerberg’s minions of all genders overdosing on Gavin’s hair gel.

Also, much like the money sent to the Taliban to “help starving people,” very little of Gavin’s “train budget” will reach the intended recipients. Most of the money will end up in the pockets of Newsom’s cronies operating construction companies and Nancy Pelosi’s fridge designers, kicking the train down the proverbial road for yet another far-left California demagogue to bring back at some future point.

But for now, Joe Biden’s printing press keeps rolling. And when Gavin Newsom learned that the states that defy Biden’s edicts will be expected to pay back their share of Covid Relief, he went: “More money for my train!”

If you found this article informative, please consider a small donation to our coffee cup to help support Conservative Journalism – or spread the word. Thank you.

 RWR original article syndication source.

Share this:

What do you think?

3 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Don’t snicker too much you who do not live in California. There are plenty of Federal tax dollars in there too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Written by Tatyana Larina

Tatyana Larina comes from my favorite work of poetry.  And that's the only time you'll see me quoting Wikipedia as a source.

I came to the US in 1991, lived in Bay Area for 30 years, and I have a Computer Science degree.  I worked in software industry for several years, later switching to a career of a full time mom, and I never looked back.  I am currently a resident of Florida.

In my younger days, I wasn’t a conservative. That is not to say that I was ever a liberal – I was not anything at all. I had no idea that there were such concepts as “conservative” and “liberal”. I did not pay attention to politics at all, and the most political knowledge you would get out of me would be who the US President was, and even for that you had to catch me on the right day.

My first introduction to politics was during the second Israeli intifada in 2002. Unspeakable violence erupted in Israel. Every day dozens of people were killed. Even though I didn’t follow politics, that deeply affected me. I felt sad, frustrated, and powerless. And one night, I happened to stumble on an MSNBC program called “Alan Keyes is making sense.” He was talking passionately about Israel and the violence, and he addressed my feelings very well.  Since that evening, I turned on Alan Keyes every night, and by his commentary he was able to take away some of the frustration and anger that I had. It was like a nightly therapy session.

Feeling intrigued after watching Alan Keyes, I wondered what else MSNBC had in store. I switched through the channels, and low and behold, I found Scarborough Country. Right off, Joe Scarborough wasn’t what he is today at all. He was a solid conservative (as I now understand), making common sense conservative points. I found him interesting and engaging. Opposing liberalism had not entered my mind at that time. I still didn’t know anything about liberalism. It was just the things he said sounded very common sense and worthwhile to me. Imagine that at some point, MSNBC had a conservative host on the air. Crazy times, ha?

Exploring my new political universe, I switched through more channels, and one night I found FOX. O’Reilly Factor was on. From the very first night, I was hooked. I abandoned Scarborough. O’Reilly was not just common sense – he was aggressive, and he was a fighter. He was Scarborough on steroids. He wasn’t just talking – he was taking on what he thought to be wrong and unjust. Ever since the first time, and until untimely end of Bill’s FOX career, I don’t think I ever missed one Factor.

For forming my political views, and my ability to formulate them, I have to give special credit to three people: Charles Krauthammer, Bill O’Reilly, and Greg Guttfeld.  To Charles - philosophy.  To Bill - realistic and pragmatic approach to politics.  To Greg - realization that a good joke will change more minds than a long lecture.

And for everything else, thanks to my family.

Covid Data

Chart of the Day: Covid Data Review (2019 to 2021) – Vaccines Working?

Djokovic: Australian Open fans react to tennis star’s absence