“No Lone Wolves:” The Media’s Quest To Blame The Republican Party for Random Acts Of Violence

Every recent incident of mass murder in the US was perpetrated by a random, lone attacker. US law enforcement has been very effective at dismantling organized crime, with the exception of, violent drug gangs that are currently running the streets of inner cities. In cases where mass murder is committed by people of color, law enforcement mainly looks the other way. Thus, armed thugs rain bullets on poor and defenseless minority residents, and as we all know, these victims are not nearly as important to the audience of The View as gender-confused Twitter ex-employees frequenting gay clubs.

So, it’s mainly the incidents that involve “random” victims that get prime-time real estate on your nightly news. The typical perpetrator of a random mass shooting is a crazy person with a gun and a death wish. He has no political affiliation and no association with a criminal network. The only attributes that unite all of them are being male, violently deranged, and growing up in a chaotic household without a proper family structure. Acknowledging all that would go a long way in stopping these attacks – but that does not advance any narratives that the media finds useful. Therefore, they point to much more obscure (read: not real) “dots” that we need to be connecting.

According to the media, the shooter is most certainly white. He regularly goes to Church on Sundays and has been known to carry a Bible around. He doesn’t think abortion is a human right. He spends his spare time on QAnon social media chat, and he has Lauren Boebert’s picture on his nightstand. He plays Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity reruns while driving a huge gas guzzler. Oh, and he is hoarding MAGA hats.

New York Times: [Every mass shooter] is a Mainstream Republican.”

The guy who attacked Paul Pelosi certainly fit that description, according to the media.  And they had a point: every “mainstream” Republican I know refers to him or herself as Jesus Christ.   Of course, there are very few “mainstream Republicans” left in San Francisco, but those who remain are almost certainly homeless, stoned out of their minds, and wondering around at 4am looking for people to kill.

A “mainstream Republican” (also known as “a threat to Democracy”) always reveals himself by yelling “Where is Nancy?”  If your wife happens to be named Nancy, and your friend comes in looking for her, don’t jump to conclusion that he wants to take her out for a drink.  As we all know, “Where is Nancy?” is a rallying cry for violent white supremacists.  Your friend is very likely a part of a “global white supremacy group” (NYT term) on his way to a daily insurrection.  If I were you, I’d be calling the FBI.

Most mass shooting incidents are committed by mentally ill people – a segment of the population that mainly resides in liberal precincts.  You have to be crazy to believe that defunding police leads to decrease in crime; that toddlers’ programming should include “a gay agenda”; and that Black Lives Matter is a charity organization.  So, if you feel like guessing the party affiliation of a mass murderer, going with a Democrat is a much safer bet.  Not that a party affiliation of a killer should make a difference.  The only thing that matters is a person “identifies” as a murderer.  That is, if you are a fair-minded person, which universally excludes the members of the media.  To them, the fact that someone just committed mass murder is trivial.  What makes an act of mass murder truly horrific is that the shooter was wearing a red hat.

Mind you, the regalia of the murderer was not always important.  You may remember that after 9/11, any connection of a killer to a predominantly Muslim country was deemed entirely superficial and purely coincidental. Back then, the media treated every Muslim terrorist as “a crazy lone wolf” in no way connected to any of the “mostly peaceful” terrorist networks.  After all, “Allahu Akbar!” could not be easily deciphered – unlike “Where is Nancy?” which is a very clear call to violence.

But to get back to home bred lunatics.  And I don’t just mean the Colorado night club shooter.  I also mean the people who say this:

Just as sure as Dr. Fauci pins every Covid variant on the “unvaccinated,” the left blames every mass shooting incident on Fox News.  That is until the crazy lunatic turns out to be one of their pet victim groups:

“In several standard motions filed on behalf of [the shooter] on Tuesday, public defenders refer to the suspect as “Mx. Aldrich,” noting in footnotes that [the shooter] is nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns.”

It is utterly unclear why a society would take time out of its busy schedule to ask for a murderer’s “preferred pronouns.”  His lawyer’s only concern should be if his client prefers mashed potatoes or French fries for his last meal.   The man will have his brain fried in about five years, yet the media wants to spare him the excruciating pain of being “misgendered.”

The fact that a deranged murderer “identified as a nonbinary” is likely not a pure coincidence. Mentally stable people don’t usually refer to themselves in a plural form. But making a connection between gender confusion and mental illness would be, once again, promoting white supremacy, LGBTQ hate, and just plain “mainstream Republican” talking point. So, predictably, the media went searching for the MAGA connection. Sure enough, “anonymous sources” found that one of the lunatic’s long-lost relatives once wore a MAGA hat. Let’s hear it for the brave investigative reporters. If it wasn’t for them, we might have been led to believe that the shooter was “just a crazy lone wolf.”

Today, there are 400 million guns out on the streets, which includes legally registered guns and illegal guns owned by criminals. It is the criminals using illegal guns who are the main perpetrators of gun violence – and it is not even close. The Democrat party wants you to believe that it is Fox News that is responsible for gun violence in America. In reality, it is soft on crime policies that allow criminals with illegal firearms to walk the streets of American cities that claim the vast majority of victims.

It is not the “mainstream Republicans,” but the Democrats protecting criminals, who have blood on their hands.

If you found this article informative, please consider a small donation to our coffee cup to help support Conservative Journalism – or spread the word. Thank you.

 RWR original article syndication source.

Share this:

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Written by Tatyana Larina

Tatyana Larina comes from my favorite work of poetry.  And that's the only time you'll see me quoting Wikipedia as a source.

I came to the US in 1991, lived in Bay Area for 30 years, and I have a Computer Science degree.  I worked in software industry for several years, later switching to a career of a full time mom, and I never looked back.  I am currently a resident of Florida.

In my younger days, I wasn’t a conservative. That is not to say that I was ever a liberal – I was not anything at all. I had no idea that there were such concepts as “conservative” and “liberal”. I did not pay attention to politics at all, and the most political knowledge you would get out of me would be who the US President was, and even for that you had to catch me on the right day.

My first introduction to politics was during the second Israeli intifada in 2002. Unspeakable violence erupted in Israel. Every day dozens of people were killed. Even though I didn’t follow politics, that deeply affected me. I felt sad, frustrated, and powerless. And one night, I happened to stumble on an MSNBC program called “Alan Keyes is making sense.” He was talking passionately about Israel and the violence, and he addressed my feelings very well.  Since that evening, I turned on Alan Keyes every night, and by his commentary he was able to take away some of the frustration and anger that I had. It was like a nightly therapy session.

Feeling intrigued after watching Alan Keyes, I wondered what else MSNBC had in store. I switched through the channels, and low and behold, I found Scarborough Country. Right off, Joe Scarborough wasn’t what he is today at all. He was a solid conservative (as I now understand), making common sense conservative points. I found him interesting and engaging. Opposing liberalism had not entered my mind at that time. I still didn’t know anything about liberalism. It was just the things he said sounded very common sense and worthwhile to me. Imagine that at some point, MSNBC had a conservative host on the air. Crazy times, ha?

Exploring my new political universe, I switched through more channels, and one night I found FOX. O’Reilly Factor was on. From the very first night, I was hooked. I abandoned Scarborough. O’Reilly was not just common sense – he was aggressive, and he was a fighter. He was Scarborough on steroids. He wasn’t just talking – he was taking on what he thought to be wrong and unjust. Ever since the first time, and until untimely end of Bill’s FOX career, I don’t think I ever missed one Factor.

For forming my political views, and my ability to formulate them, I have to give special credit to three people: Charles Krauthammer, Bill O’Reilly, and Greg Guttfeld.  To Charles - philosophy.  To Bill - realistic and pragmatic approach to politics.  To Greg - realization that a good joke will change more minds than a long lecture.

And for everything else, thanks to my family.

Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com eyes retreat from Southeast Asian markets Indonesia, Thailand to sharpen focus on home market

China’s small lenders bear brunt of risks in banking sector as economic slowdown exposes weak fundamentals